These are the headlines that line our newspapers and
cover our favourite newsworthy blogsites and forums. It’s amazing how many top
executives are receiving a hefty annual income bolstered by exorbitant bonus obligations
by company stockholders. It’s almost a daily occurrence that hard working
citizens the world over are shocked and outraged by the amount of money these
seemingly ‘lucky’ fat-cat executives receive simply for doing their jobs.
I’m not going to lie, there’s a part of my scalp that
itches and my left eye twitches when I hear about someone already in a position
of power being paid yet another annual bonus of multi-millions because they
can.
Over the past four years, twenty of the U. S’s top banks paid
out more than two billion dollars in deductible performance bonuses to their
top executives. In Australia, pay packets did shrink by an average of three
percent, but the annual payout of bonuses increased dramatically leading to
investigations by several major authorities.
These annual increases in bonuses and often hefty
supplement salaries have also become topics of debate among politicians and
used as a platform to coerce votes. It’s safe to say that there’s nothing that
pleases the lower income-earner more than knowing the rich will somehow be
penalised for their success and the playing field levelled for those not
capable of keeping up with the Jones’s.
I have to wonder if these newspaper articles and blog
reports regarding company expenditure and bonus payout don’t just irk us simply
because we are not the intended recipients? I have no doubt that some major
corporations are underhanded in their executive appointment of salaries and
bonuses while the worker bees of the company are set to suffer on minimum wage.
I also have no doubt that some of these CEO’s have sacrificed time with their
loved ones; hours upon hours spent in corporate towers worldwide going over
documents and overseeing projects. There is fairness and blatant acts of
disregard for employees across any occupation whether entry level or executive.
It’s easy for a lower income-earner like myself to
criticise big companies for their gross expenditure on a few, highly
prioritised individuals rather than the worker populace as a whole, but that
would also be a massive assumption on my part that every profitable company is
extorting their workers for the sake of executive income.
For example, LinkedIn’s CEO—Jeff Weiner—boosted employee
morale this year by distributing his annual fourteen-million-dollar stock bonus
to avoid internal talent from jumping the proverbial ship. Bill Gates—net worth
ninety-billion-dollars—consistently gives his money away to various charity
groups including giving thirty-billion-dollars to the Melinda Gates Foundation
to fight hunger, disease and poverty. Spanx founder—Sara Blakely—has helped
many women world-wide finance their college educations and also donated one
million to Oprah’s Leadership Academy for girls in South Africa.
As you can see, despite our own personal jealousy and
inability to subsidise our own low incomes with multi-million dollar bonuses,
there are top company executive out there trying to make a difference in a
world so desperately driven by the almighty dollar. Although there are those
that abuse a multitude of systems and some that support abolishing poverty too,
it’s simply best to focus on what you can control; your own personal
contribution to either your wealth or the betterment of those not nearly as
financially settled. Every single day someone dies from poverty-stricken
conditions. The choice is really up to the individual to make a difference and
if that person isn’t you, then how the hell can you ride a high horse about
CEO’s that may at least try?
Kristy J
No comments:
Post a Comment
Yes! I absolutely love your comments, and, now that I have read through the blogger instructions and actually know how to answer them, we are all sweet - so please, write!